Main | December 2007 »

Nationals make a Trade

November 30, 2007

So it's interesting that the Nationals are "in the market" and made what I think is an excellent trade. ESPN reports that the Nationals acquired Lastings Milledge for Ryan Church and Brian Schneider. My initial thoughts are that we won't miss Church. He was a touted prospect who ended being a good filler when we needed the help. Schneider however will be missed.

It also appears that the Mets get what they want/needed...a solid catcher. Because those 700 or so pitchers that went through the Nationals last season were all handled by Schneider. For both sides, a fair trade.

I'm curious though about the intra-division trade. That's taboo in the NFL and the NBA, but why not MLB? Oh, maybe the Mets don't think the Nats are any threat to them. I tend to agree, until we sign a couple of good arms.

Thanks to the Sports Freak to for notifying me of the story.

Sean Taylor Suspects?

This from the Miami Herald. If it is true, I hope this helps the Redskins and all fans heal faster

Hall of Fame Selections

November 29, 2007

More Redskins are eligible as semi-finalists than in recent years. Green, Jacoby, Grimm, and Monk have all made it to the semi-final round.

Very few offensive linemen are in the hall of fame, but it's utterly amazing how the doors at Canton have failed to open for Art Monk. Is it really any failure on Monk's part or more of a reflection on some of those eligible to vote?

When you compare Monk to his peers on pure statistics you can still make a great case for him. Monk often gained more than one thousand yards. He also scored a bevy of touchdowns and traditionally caught many of his passes for first downs dispelling the notion of only being a possession receiver.

He was ahead of the game and passed Largent for the record of most receptions in a season at that time. Monk was double teamed often in his career. He was a constant on a team that relied on him heavily. He only had downtown Charlie Brown for a few years in the mid '80s.

After Brown's departure, it took a couple of years for Clark to develop and a couple years after that for Sanders to emerge as the third wide out and threat in the late '80s. I'm sure we all remember the failures before Clark's arrival on the scene as the Redskins tried desperately to acquire receiver and often found themselves on the wrong end of a trade or free agent pick up from the Raiders for wide receiver help.

The quarterbacks may have changed, but Art Monk was a constant. From a deep threat early in his career to an intermediate route runner with superb skills at running patterns with very soft hands. He was a quarterback's best friend from Theisman to Rypien. It was Monk's consistantcy and clutch performances that helped the Redskins make the playoffs so often during his tenure.

Some argue that he was a possession receiver and others argue that he had too much talent around him to get in the hall. Well which is it b/c he was as good if not a better possession receiver than Largent and had as much talent and did as much for his team as an Irvin or Rice.

Rice had Montanna & Young and Irvin had Aikman. Both of these receivers had great offensive lineman and hall of fame quarterbacks. Irvin even had a hall of fame running back to take the pressure off of him. Monk had constant changes at all the skill positions around him and always excelled no matter who was around him.

Now let's not forget what a class act he was on and off the field. Some may not have appreciated his quiet and reserved demeanor when it came time for interviews. Monk always seemed professional and respectful to the media. For individuals to hold a grudge against him for not being as accessible as say a Portis or a quote machine as a Smoot of today then it reflects upon them and not on Monk because he's the epitome of a hall of famer in every sense of the word.

Terps Rebound

November 28, 2007

The Terps overcame their early season turnover struggles to bring home a win at Comcast Center tonight 69-61.

The Maryland backcourt duo should be one of the best in the conference and lead the Terps in most offensive categories, but who else will step up on this young team? Dupree and Tucker helped vault the Terps into the lead for good mid way through the second half.

Having a player like Dupree assert himself and be consistent on the boards will help open up the scoring in Gary Williams flex offense. Not since Baxter, has Gary had a player with offensive potential that also sets a good screen for his shooters.

Dupree can bang the boards, get his shot off the block, and set some excellent screens for his teammates. In tonight’s game, Dupree was able to provide valuable minutes and avoid foul trouble. It will be fun to watch Dupree develop as the season progresses.

The other coming out party for the Terps belongs to Tucker. His silky smooth shot, quick first step cutting down the lane, and his explosiveness cutting down the passing lanes on defense make him one of the most exciting young Terps to follow.

Milbourne looks tentative on the court and seems the most comfortable on the defensive side of the ball and in transition.

In an interesting decision by Gary to play Vasquez at the point and Hayes at the off guard spot. Hayes does have the better shot, but also possesses better command of running the offense in a half court set. Much like GM Bowden for the Nationals calls Marrero a batter (and doesn’t identify a specific position) I call Vazquez’s best position “scorer”. He’s masterful in the transition offense and exciting to watch. The Terps will only get better as the season unfolds as the two guards learn how to feed off of each other.

What Blueprint?

There has been a lot of talk this week about the Eagles having unearthed some sort of defensive blueprint for defeating the Patriots. I think this is nonsense. In the game Sunday I saw a Pats offense that was disrupted at times, but was essentially able to move the ball. Brady was still able to complete well over 60% of his passes and convert a number of key third downs. Look, if you are able to put pressure on the QB using the blitz, it's going to make his job tougher by forcing him to make quicker decisions. This is no big secret. But for the most part the Pats handled the blitz. More importantly, Brady made good decisions and did not turn the ball over.

The Eagles success in the game had much more to do with the play of their offense. A.J. Feely had a career game and Philadelphia was able to keep the chains moving, converting on 8 of 13 third downs, and on their lone fourth down attempt. The Eagles also used an ultra-aggressive offensive gameplan, recovering a surprise onside kick, and attempting several gadget plays, albeit with limited success. They were able to sustain long drives and limit the number of possessions by the Pats offense. This game showed that the best way to beat the Patriots is by having an aggressive, efficient, and mistake-free offense. Sure it may help your team's chances of winning if you can get pressure on Brady, but more importantly, your offense has to score a lot of points and take a lot of time doing it. Philadelphia's few mistakes were what cost them the game.

Maryland Terrapins Bowl Bid

November 27, 2007

After Maryland demolished the Wolfpack, the Terps became bowl eligible. The two most likely scenarios involve MD playing in Boise or San Francisco.

It's great to see the Terps battle back from all of the injuries and extend the season by one more game. The thought of a game in Cal. would be appealing for alumni in the area, but a game in Boise just makes me think of stopping by my local 5 Guys and having some fries from the potato of the day maybe even from Rigby, Idaho or a delicious baked potato from Houston's.

In all seriousness, ESPN had a list of potential favorite bowl match ups and one very remote bowl game that made their list of appealing games was MD vs. Penn St. That would be great to see that rivalry renewed.

Too bad Friedgen couldn't get Joe Pa on the schedule during the couple of down years. It would be nice to finally get a win against the nittany lions.


Sport Center Anchor Team

Last night after Monday Night Football, Kenny Mayne and Scott Van Pelt were anchoring the Sports Center Desk.

They were hysterical! They were so good last night they even broke each other up.

I thought it couldn't get any better than John Anderson and Scott Van Pelt (Mr. Maryland Terrapin)...dry and dryer. Somehow they finish each other's sentences and are just hilarious. Which anchor team is your favorite?

Thoughts

It’s interesting the attachment people make to their sports teams and icons. While it would be going too far to say that sports figures are like family, fans all do feel in some way a connection with an athlete. I think in some small way we feel they are an extension of us, represent us, or at least possess qualities we would like ourselves to have - the athleticism, the perseverance, the cunning, the success and the passion.

That’s why when our teams and sports heroes win, we’re overcome with joy and our day or week becomes a little brighter. When they lose we feel that disappointment even more. And when something as tragic as the passing of a sports hero happens, fans all feel like they’ve lost a really good friend even when they’ve never met their hero in person.

I’ve been a Redskins fan a long time, but it’s only recently I’ve had the financial freedom and willingness to sink money into higher priced fan paraphernalia like jerseys and such. Even then, with today’s era of free agency and salary caps it is hard for me to justify buying the jersey of a player who might not be here next year. Interestingly enough though, a Taylor jersey is the first thing I purchased as sign of support for the revitalized Redskins under Coach Gibbs in the 2005 season.

I don’t exactly know why I went with Taylor over other players like Portis or Moss. I guess in the end it was because Taylor was a Redskin from the beginning and with the way he played on the field – hard-nosed, scrappy, feared and willing to blow up any and every one on it – I figured he’d be a Redskin for a very long time.

That is why this loss hurts Redskins Nation so much -- beyond the fact that he was a Redskin from the beginning; beyond the fact that we all admired the way he played football; beyond the fact that he was maturing on and off the field. It’s always hard to deal with the death of someone who had so much more to give and receive from life.

Sean’s death provokes a multitude of thoughts within me. It makes me reflect on the fragility of life and how we need to take advantage of this precious commodity to love, laugh and share ourselves with others. It makes me think of all the violence out in the streets and communities of America and the world. It makes me question how sometimes perpetrators can justify the logic of such actions.

And it makes me think how we go about our daily lives and usually end up ignoring these reflections, thoughts and questions until it’s too late.

Tragedy

Terrible news after what we all thought was a good sign yesterday evening. As you may have heard, Sean Taylor passed away overnight. Last night, Vinnie Cerrato of the Redskins and Sean's father gave us reports that Sean had squeezed a doctor's hand on command. This morning, some reports say that was reflex.

I'm shocked. More shocked than yesterday when I heard the news that he was shot. Probably because when I left the house this morning at 5:30, NBC4 was still reporting him alive. Then on my way to the metro, I heard that he had passed away. I was hoping that it was erroneous report. That some news lackey had pushed the wrong button and published it on Fox5's website, from which DC101 was reporting it. But then it was all over the place.

Senseless act to take the life of a human being, not matter what his history was.

As my fellow Premium ticket holder Q noted, stating that he would wear his #21 jersey the rest of the season, plan on remembering Taylor, somehow, someway.

Rest in Peace #21.

Sean Taylor Shot

November 26, 2007

Just got this from WTOP. So are we surprised?

WTOP Story

Me, yes, to some degree. It seemed that after his little incident some time ago that he was a changed man. But then again, Pacman Jones says he's a changed man.

All kidding aside, I hope he has a speedy recovery.

Welcome

November 25, 2007

Welcome to the DC Sports Page. We created this site to discuss sports in general, with a concentration on DC area based or related teams. But that will not stop us from discussing sports from any area.

So what is your role? Comments please! Because we know some read, but only if we get feedback in the form of comments, do we know we are reaching you. Whether you are a life-long Washingtonian (like both founders), a new comer (BTW - walk up/down Metro escalators to the left, stand on the right), or out in Kansas, we welcome all.

To protect the names of the guilty, we are using alias on the site. Occassionally you will see postings from our trusted and valued friends who know more or better than we do about a particular subject. Those guilty will be protected as well.

Thanks and welcome to the story.

BMT and the Sports Freak

The Kolzig Quandary

November 24, 2007

Before the rebuild began the Caps made the decision to retain Olie and trade Bondra. It appeared that Olie was playing well and would return solid value back. Ultimately, the Caps didn’t receive the value back for Bondra’s services.

Looking down the road if the Caps continue to struggle a decision will have to made on whether to receive some good value for Olie, who if kept, would be almost 40 at the end of next season.

Fan favorite or not, all Caps fans want to see a winner return to Washington. It’s a matter of receiving the right value back in return. A bona fide top prospect ready to contribute would be what to hold out for even if tossing in a mid-tier prospect or pick of the Caps.

In just a matter of years Olie will be almost 40 and who knows what he’ll have left. Brent Johnson isn’t the answer and at some point the two goal tenders (from Finland and Russia) drafted a couple of years ago will be thrust into the spot light. Some might remember Carey & Kolzig fighting for the starting roster position in the ‘90s, so this isn’t unheard of for the Caps.

What the Caps do will be determined more by the record than by anything else. The front office decisions have been off the board at times so you never know what will happen, but more importantly are the Caps prepared to make such a tough decision?

Capitals - Hanlon Fired

November 23, 2007

Coach Hanlon fired on Thanksgiving. Should GM George McPhee be worried about a similar decision on Christmas or New Years Day, if things don’t improve?

The Capitals have been notorious for having bad starts to a season, so why should this season seem so desperate so early? Would the sense of complete failure be due to the standings in the Eastern Conference or the free agent signings and message of the rebuilding process is over from senior management and ownership? The Caps should have had a contingency plan for just such a scenario.

This isn’t a young team chalked full of rookies and inexperienced players anymore. Veterans were brought in to help the team make the playoffs. A decision could have definitely been made to make a change in coaching after the signings. Why leave Hanlon there if you believe that the team is maturing and will surpass his skills as a coach the following year? If you’re already aware that the coach is losing the team as some would say then why not have a plan in place to replace the coach and move forward directly after a game instead of waiting a day and on Thanksgiving at that.

It’s interesting that after ownership had a disastrous affair with Coach Cassidy they replaced him with another minor league coach. Now Hanlon has been replaced mid-season and the Caps have turned to yet another minor league coach for a not so young team. How can the Caps move forward without thinking down the road?

Patriots - The High Octane Humiliation Machine

November 21, 2007

Who will slow down the juggernaut that is The New England Patriots?

It's become very obvious that the Patriots are the best team in the league, but are they intentionally humiliating teams in an effort to send a message to the league and commissioner? It makes sense that starters need to play a full game and be conditioned for instances where they'll need to be ready to play a full game later in the season or playoffs. It also makes sense to run your offense as you normally would, but when does the coach cross the line when the game becomes out of hand.

It's best to check the past Patriots teams and ask when Belichik had a game in hand did he look to "run up the score" or play the game with a professional courtesy. Everyone can agree that it's the defens' job to stop and offense and get off the field anytime they want, if they stop someone.

The issue is whether kicking a field goal or going for it is rubbing it in. In the '80's coaches had an 'old code' of professional courtesy. Teams would run the ball and it would be up to the defense to stop what they knew was coming, another running play. The offense would only pass to secure a first down and keep the clock moving. Throwing a 5 yard pass where the receiver runs through the defense for a 50 yard touchdown is far different then a 50 yard bomb down the field.

Another interesting play selection is going for it close to the goal line. In a portion of opportunities the choice has been to pass the ball resulting in a touchdown rather than a choice of running the ball and either picking up the first down due to the failure of the defense or turning the ball over on downs when the play fails.

The argument has been made that going for it is less humiliating than kicking a field goal. The rebuttal for such a case would be that in any other situation in a close game a defense would always consider a field goal a moral victory than surrendering a touchdown. Holding your opponent to a field goal and getting the ball back in the hands of the offense is the name of the game. If a lead is in hand, then how many touchdowns would need to be scored to put the Patriots in jeopardy when their ahead by 30 points. Trading field goals for touchdowns would take more touchdowns than the opposition had probably already scored in the game and be nearly impossible, so why run the score up? Maybe this could be the way of the cementing a legacy and dynasty status for the Patriots as the most dominating team in recent memory with or without a video tape incident. After all, how could you argue that video taping provided much help when a team is pounding the opposition into the ground on a weekly basis.

Breaking News

Gilbert Arenas will miss at least another 3 Months after under going MCL surgery on the same surgically repaired knee.

Redskins Part I - A Win for the Future

November 20, 2007

Although the Redskins failed to post a "W" in the win column, they won an even larger battle towards solving an identity problem as they move closer to regaining the tradition of Gibbs Version 1.0 from 1981-1992.

Injuries shouldn't be the primary reason why a team loses when other capable players need to step up to maintain the team's attitude and approach to games. In the case of the Redskins, injuries to key individuals have continued to mount as the weeks progress. The Patriots, considered the best team in recent memory to break the Miami Dolphins record unbeaten season, know all to well about injuries as their dynasty in the NFL is all but secured. Injuries may have slowed the playbook down, but never hindered the quintessential philosophy of the Patriots by confounding the opposing teams offense despite several key players missing significant time on the defensive side of the ball including a depleted secondary and even converting a wide receiver to defensive back. So it comes as no surprise that Joe Bugel and Joe Gibbs have been able to turn essentially three journeyman offensive lineman and a rookie into capable players along the offensive line. Realistic expectations must be set when evaluating this team and comparing them to the glory days of the '80s.

The offense was dealt a serious blow when Jon Jansen went down for the year and then was struck down again as a torn triceps muscle to Randy Thomas will cause him to miss most of the season. Injuries to the back-ups along with failed experiments in the pre-season have caused this rag tag group of players to come together and begin to form some continuity, but realistic expectations must be set. The Redskins can't replace a Jansen or Thomas but we should be able to expect the offense to take shape and redeploy a game plan suited to the current cast along the line in an effort score more than 21 points a game. It's interesting to note that most people have already forgotten Derrick Dockery and have quietly overlooked his replacement. Over the past few years, Chris Samuels has received many accolades including visits to the Pro Bowl during Dockery's tenure as the starting left guard. We often heard coaches on telecasts say they were looking for consistency as Dockery continued to grow, but what we often saw was Samuels getting beat. Samuels getting beat by players that were quick and moved to the outside and by players taking an inside route or even a bull rush up the middle. It wasn't until Dockery was replaced by a offensive lineman cast aside by the Jets and considered to be a journeyman to most casual skins fans that something changed. Did anyone seem to notice that continuity and consistency building along the left side of the offensive line? Yes, as running plays were diverted to the left side with greater frequency. As a result of the loss of Jansen and Thomas more plays were following Samuels and Kendall, but continuing to run plays on this side of the ball shows their effectiveness. This being even more apparent on pass protection. What was once line backers, safeties, and lineman running free along the left side with Dockery was no more. The communication and continuity between the Samuels and Kendall is reflected in the low sack totals and pressure on Campbell. This chemistry and understanding of assignments at critical times is vital to allow a pocket to form and to protect Campbell. Wade and Fabini have held their own, but at times have stumbled. This is the nature of the game. Remembering that if Wade and Fabini were such talented starting lineman why would they have found themselves as a back up in Washington. The coaching staff has now unveiled more of the playbook to Campbell and has finally spread the offense out to create better running lanes for Portis and Betts and create a greater threat to defenses in the passing game.

The NFL goes through cycles of different philosophies. Some years you want to bunch the line together and other years you need to spread the offense out. Staring a .500 record in the mirror the coaching staff decided to open things up against Dallas regardless of injuries and provided a look into the Redskins future and identity. The Redskins were expected to lose and lose big by the pundits. The game within a game found Clinton Portis running well against a very tough Cowboys defense and with a depleted and hobbled receiving core Jason Campbell moved the ball up and down the field for the first time with consistency against a tough playoff bound opponent. The offense played tough and didn't wilt under pressure. Moss provided a memorable and spectacular one handed grab during the game for a big play. He'd been hampered by injuries most of the season as has Randel-El. Players signed over the past few weeks were also making their presence felt. Although we'll only have Monk, Clark, Sanders, Charlie Brown, and Didier running free down the field in easy fashion against the opposition in our memory and on tape, this game showed just what this offense can be. It's easy to see that Saunders and Gibbs can't wait for a healthy group after seeing such proud performances. It provides hope for the rest of the season and a glimmer into the future when Thomas and Jansen return and receivers regain that stride not seen since September due to injuries. For the first time in a long time the Redskins have found a QB that can win a game. In the '80's, we recall close games with key offensive adjustments at half-time resulting in Redskins wins or even shear blow-outs, but this could all be traced to winning the battle in the trenches with a power running game and near flawless pass protection. How else would Doug Williams and Mark Rypien be able to pick defenses apart. We all know Gibbs record of winning three super bowls with three different QB's, but the offensive line largely stayed in tact during those years as did most of the receivers. A brilliant cast surrounded the QB position to allow the position to do just one thing - run Joe Gibbs offense and in the Super Bowl years it was run to near perfection. The question now is - now that there's a quarterback capable of running a myriad of plays and winning a game, how does Gibbs upgrade the rest of the offense? The Hogs, Riggins, Monk, Clark, Sanders, and a host of others helped make the Skins what we all recall in our memories today. How do the Skins recapture the high level at which the hogs set or find a receiver the likes of Art Monk that Moss and Randel-El can compliment? Some answers can be provided by isolating weaknesses in the opposition while others will take time and the utilization of a large playbook at the complete disposal of the starting quarterback. Rypien, Joe T., and Doug Williams were afforded the luxury of having countless seconds to drop back and pass to pick a defense apart. The best thing for this offense is a good dose of hard nosed running with a vertical passing game. During the peak of Gibbs first tenure, we'd often see drives ending in a touchdown preceded by running plays, but there were also drives started with a first down play action pass for 20+ yard gains. It was a 100% aggressive offense with a balance of run and pass. More often than not the offensive line would be able to dominate the opposing team by the 4th quarter. On the odd occasion that a strong team belted them in the jaw, the skins were able to not only take a blow but not even blink and deliver one right back. This is the glimpse that we saw at the end of the game against a tough Cowboys team and even though it's not reflected in the score one can only imagine the impact Jon Jansen, a tough throw back to the hogs, or Randy Thomas could have had on this game. The Redskins played tough, took their shots down the field, weathered the storm, and held their own in big D-.

Surprised by...

November 18, 2007

So at 3:30 PM today, I started to think about today's Redskins Cowboys game. I already had my article written in my head. The title was to be "Ugh". As in awful. Because I imagined the score would be 21-3 at half and 37-17 or something like that at the end of the game.

Of course, we saw the unbelieveable. The Redskins led at the half. They were in the game the entire game. Minutes left, they had a chance to score. They failed. The defense stopped the Cowboys. The offense got the ball back again. And they had another chance to win it. Never had it crossed my mind that it would come down to the Hail Mary. Fitting though that TO was there, playing DB on that final play.

So while I'm not exactly happy that the Redskins lost to our archnemesis, at the same time, I'm not dissapointed. Which for this season's Redskins, is a pretty good thing.